Area-1255 ~Logo~

Saturday, December 31, 2016

...

----------------------------------------------------
Work in Progress.
----------------------------------------------------

Only certain users can see content in this Page.

Contact the Administrator to request a VIP Log-In.

Area-1255 "Swamp of Mystery" & Realm of Fire


  • Area-1255 "Swamp of Mystery"
  • Area-1255 "Fire Portal"
  • Area-1255 ''Light Portal"

These are new 'versions' of Area-1255 however I do not own or author them.

Does Ketotifen Increase Muscle Mass? (Ketotifen As a A Muscle-Builder) Anabolic Effects of Ketotifen.



As explored in our earlier articles, Ketotifen For PCT & Does Ketotifen Really "Upregulate" Beta-Adrenergic Receptors, Ketotifen possesses both Testosterone-boosting and beta-receptor boosting effects. That means it is both pro-catecholamine, and pro-androgen, and has very powerful effects on muscle mass and manlihood because of that. Nobody should short-change or underplay the benefits of this drug, or attempt to displace the ''good research'' by purported side-effects that may be due to components of an individuals steroid cycle.

I aim to make this a short article. Read these books/Papers. They do not require downloads or any special program.


Dermatol Clin. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 Oct 1.


OVERVIEW/SUMMARY/ATTRIBUTES
  1. Ketotifen has many attributes that make it a ''partial'' muscle-building or anabolic substance. In combination with other substances though, ketotifen certainly acts like an 'amplifier' of anabolic-activity.
  2. Ketotifen has neuroprotective effects, and can be a great anti-inflammatory as well.
  3. Ketotifen performs beautifully at, reducing stress and improving sleep.
  4. Ketotifen is able to improve Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
  5. Ketotifen can improve other neurological conditions; such as Fibromyalgia [!].
  6. Ketotifen can improve energy levels.
  7. Ketotifen can reduce Fear.
  8. Ketotifen can increase IGF-1 [!]
  9. Ketotifen can improve overall body health by balancing cytokine activity [!].

KETOTIFEN AS A MUSCLE-BUILDER IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS

Ketotifen has the ability to inhibit Tumor-necrosis-Factor-Alpha, which is a signaling protein; specifically a ''cytokine'', involved in multiple bodily processes, most notably, cellular reproduction and division. As a target in RA : Rheumatoid Arthritis, and as a target in Cancer patients, the protein is a valuable target in disease states where cellular activities go wrong. 

TNF-a also plays a role in male and female fertility, and has a role in establishing early reproductive development. As later the protein also plays a role in signaling between immune cells of reproductive organs, it then also is capable of signaling 'inflammation' between cells. If activated, and under the right circumstances, TNF-a suppresses bodily Testosterone production in Men & Women, which seems to account for the suppression of hormone production and / or hypogonadal state observed in long-term chronic illness.

This association was also found in Young Men, who typically had the lowest levels of TNF-a, and because of this, had the highest levels of Testosterone.

Therefore, because it is a testosterone booster, elevates IGF-1 due to this and because of its cytokine modulating properties; including TNF-a, it remains a powerful medicine capable of conferring many benefits to Bodybuilders.

This makes Ketotifen also a diverse medication, and one that should be kept in mind when dealing with infertility, either self, or couple, and especially if allergic, Asthmatic and inflammation is present in the infertile patient.

Ketotifen For PCT (Can Ketotifen Be Used for PCT / Is Ketotifen Suitable for PCT?)


Ketotifen is a well-established fat loss Agent due to its ability to stimulate the sensitivity of beta-adrenergic receptors, and in some cases, to totally prevent downregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors. This enhances the metabolism activating effect of catecholamines; including noradrenaline/adrenaline, as well as pharmaceutical fat loss agents such as Clenbuterol ("Clen"). By preserving and / or increasing beta-adrenergic receptors, Ketotifen makes itself as one of those 'lost-secrets' of the bodybuilding communities. 


This is where its ability to possibly restore or help to restore natural Testosterone production comes into play. TNF-a inhibits testosterone production at the testicular level [4] [5] [6] , and the hypothalamic level (GnRH reduction) [7] [8], TNF-a inhibitors, increase testosterone production in humans [9] [10] [11]. Pentoxifylline is an example of a TNF-a inhibitor and Xanthine derivative [12] [13] [14]. Pentoxifylline and Ketotifen both share the ability to boost human leydig cell function and Testosterone production [15] [16] [17].

Therefore, the proud answer to this question is a big.

YES.

Ketotifen CAN be used as PCT.
...But as an addition to one.

It's not strong enough to handle the whole deal on its own fellas.

It boosts Test levels, but must be used in conjunction with a normal or Advanced PCT Regimen. Depending on what kind of compound or cycle you were on. The duration of the cycle and the doses used during the cycle, as well as individual factors.

Ketotifen can be bought at the following store --> Geneza Pharm.
Read more about Ketotifen here --> Steroid.com Ketotifen
General Information on Ketotifen's relevance to Bodybuilding --> Needtogetaas. My take on Ketotifen.

A few more things to say about Ketotifen.

BETA-ADRENERGIC RELATED INCREASES IN LH/FSH/TESTOSTERONE

  • Beta-2-Adrenergic receptors are directly tied to Testosterone production and StAR (steroidogenic-acute-regulatory-protein) [18] [19] [20].
  • Activating them results in increases in androgen production, possibly androgen receptors and a subsequent anabolic effect [21] [22].
  • Thus Ketotifen and all adrenergic-enhancers are able to increase Testosterone production by this mechanism as well [23].



Does Ketotifen Really "Upregulate" Beta-Adrenergic Receptors...IN MUSCLE?



For years bodybuilding communities have been touting Ketotifen as some 'magic pill' for upregulating the beta-adrenergic-2 receptors. What we commonly refer to as simply 'beta-receptors'. These receptors are proven mediators of metabolic enhancement; fat burning namely.  They allow us to easier reach our goals of getting shredded and defined.

The problem is - we need to make sure we are actually upregulating the beta-receptors in the muscle, just because something ''upregulates'' them in the Lungs, doesn't mean it will do that elsewhere, and to be clear, I'm not saying it doesn't do that. So little spoiler alert, but you want to read the rest of this to get the full picture.

Ketotifen is a second-generation H1-selective antihistamine with second-messenger enhancing properties [1] [2] [3]. The benefits in Asthma have been accounted for as a functional upregulation in beta-adrenergic 'sensitivity' and density [4] [5]. Now let's go over those terms. 
  • An upregulation simply means an increase in the number of receptors [6].
  • An increase in sensitivity / responsiveness simply means the receptors respond better and more efficiently, to natural adrenaline and ligands such as Clenbuterol [7].
  • An increase in density refers to the increase in the number of receptors studied in a given region, or organ, or culture [8] [9]


<Read this Article on Receptor Density/Affinity>

A ligand is simply a substance that is able to fulfill a certain role in science, but specifically it refers a substance occupying a given target receptor.

So now we fulfill the rest of the research.

DOES KETOTIFEN CONSISTENTLY UPREGULATE BETA-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS?

You bet!

But it does so in a manner that is very variable depending on DOSE USED and duration of use. Ketotifen usually takes about 'a week to get those results in. Beta-receptor upregulation and sensitization would occur after Day 3 in most people. 

The idea behind ketotifen use of course, isn't a new one. It has been done for years and with good results. Some guys wanna make sure its not all in their head though - and I get that.

KETOTIFEN & MUSCLE

There were some studies published in 1996 that indicated that Ketotifen caused weight (including muscle) gain, but in HIV-infected individuals and that the weight gain is caused by TNF-alpha reduction/decreases, but that may also lend support to the beta-receptor hypothesis of anabolism. Since beta-agonists characteristically DECREASE TNF-a themselves [10], this may be the direct result of enhancement of the beta-adrenergic mediated effect by Ketotifen. Once an increase in receptors or receptor sensitivity has been established, then even the natural noradrenaline produced by the human body, as well as adrenaline from other sources, including Epi-pens would be more effective in performing its actions.

Although most of the research regarding Ketotifen focused on mast cells and lymphocytes, there have been some small-scale brain/heart research studies which have provided additional evidence for Ketotifen's widespread upregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors [11] [12] [13].

However, the majority of research focuses on the attenuation of beta-receptor desensitization [14] [15] [16]

Many folks have spouted off saying that Ketotifen can upregulate beta-receptors in just or under 6 hours, that is just not true, nothing works that fast, and that's a misconception unfortunately.

Another common misconception is that ''because Ketotifen is an antihistamine, all antihistamines may increase beta-adrenergic-receptors'', yet, Ketotifen is actually the only antihistamine reliably proven to do so. It displays remarkable brain penetration, as noted in these PET studies

Not only that, but also anecdotally, via forum reports, every community would affirm that Benadryl and other 'crap' antihistamines do nothing for muscle or fat loss, if anything, they make you fatter. Ketotifen is what works. It is said again and again, and it does have anabolic effects.

Several other studies have been conducted since 2006, and some of the newer human studies with Ketotifen have also reinforced the beta-adrenergic modulating actions of this drug [17] [18] [19]. It remains in clinical use for Asthma in most countries, though it is (sadly) withdrawn from the U.S market, it can still be ordered by an Allergist through a compounding pharmacy. A general Doc should also be able to do this, if he is willing [20] [21] [22].

Everything here seems to support the consensus that Ketotifen upregulates beta-adrenergic receptors all throughout the body, but more research needs to be conducted on muscle-related and anabolism related disorders. That is to reach a sensible conclusion that Ketotifen is indeed a non-selective but muscle-acting anabolic agent - through beta-receptor-sparing and upregulating activities [23]. The profile of the medication is elucidated more when viewing the National Library of Medicine's page through the NIH.

***OTHER INTERESTING ARTICLES/CITATIONS***

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Feb; 39(2): 109–118.

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009 Nov;12(6):601-6. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283318a25.

Feng Qing, Christopher G. Rhodes, Michael J. Hayes, Thomas Krausz, S. William Fountain, Terry Jones and J.M.B. Hughes
MRC Clinical Sciences Center, Cyclotron Unit, and Departments of Medicine (Respiratory Division) and Histopathology,
Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Thoracic Surgical Unit, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex, United Kingdom


In/Tags: ketotifen muscle agent, ketotifen anabolic action, ketotifen anabolic properties, ketotifen muscle sparing, ketotifen anti-inflammatory actions, ketotifen vs benadryl, ketotifen or benadryl in upregulating beta-receptors, ketotifen and adrenaline, ketotifen noradrenaline correlation, ketotifen adrenaline receptors, ketotifen adrenergic activities, ketotifen effect on steroids, ketotifen effect on plasma noradrenaline, ketotifen effect on anxiety, ketotifen affect on anxiety, ketotifen actions with anxiety, ketotifen stimulating or no, ketotifen with steroids, ketotifen effect on endogenous testosterone, ketotifen buy online 2016, ketotifen research chemicals 2016, ketotifen research enthusiasm 2016, ketotifen buy online 2017, ketotifen buy online no prescription 2017, ketotifen buy without compounding pharmacy 2017, ketotifen buy international 2016, ketotifen buy from online dealer 2016, ketotifen buy online no script 2016, ketotifen libido, ketotifen libido enhancer, ketotifen libido reducer, ketotifen masteron, ketotifen proviron, ketotifen winny, ketotifen anabolic compounds, ketotifen list of anabolics, ketotifen anabolic actions on steroids, ketotifen for PCT, ketotifen for post-cycle-therapy, ketotifen for post-cycle training, ketotiften buy online, ketotifen buy through world, ketotifen buy throughout world, ketotifen buy internat deale, ketotifen buy internet dealer, ketotfien buy drug online, ketotifen buy medicine online, ketotitfen, ketofirl, ketoftifen, ketotifen buy internat off, ketotifen buy off the internet 2016, ketotifen buy off the internet 2017, ketotifen buy off the internet 2015, ketotifen sources on internet, ketotifen international buying 2014, ketotifen international buying 2015, ketotifen international buying 2016


ketotifen on steroid sites, ketotifen on aas sites, ketotifen by steroids, ketofien testimony by bodybuilders and powerlifters, ketotifen testimonial by powerlifter, ketotifen testimony by mma fighter

ketotifen anabolic actions explored, ketotifen medication actions, ketotifen full read-out explained

Friday, December 30, 2016

Dosing Terms / List of Prescription Dose Abbreviations / Medication Dosing Schedules

---DOSING TERMS/ABBREVIATIONS---

P.O : Oral dosing.
I.M : Intramuscular (injection)
SubQ : Subcutaneous injection
Rectally : rectally
I.V : Intravenous (in-the-vein/a vein injection)
O.D : in the right eye
O.S : in the left eye
O.U : in both eyes

Q.D:  once a day
B.I.D: twice a day
T.I.D:       three times a day
Q.I.D: four times a day
Q.H.S:    before bed
5X a day:    five times a day
Q.4H:          every four hours
Q.6H:       every six hours
Q.O.D: every other day
PRN: as needed


EOD: Every Other Day
E2D: Every 2 Days.
E3D: Every 3 Days.
Q.T.T: drop/dropper/eye drops
A.C:     before meals
P.C.  after meals


***NOTES***
EOD, E2D, E3D typically indicate the drug is administered (Self or by a Nurse or Physician) once in that many days, so in other words, corresponding to the half-life of the medication, you would dose every three days once. Same if E2D, every two days once, unless otherwise noted on the pamphlet that came with the med or unless strict directions were given to dose more than one time in one day.
Subcutaneous injections are typically given near the Abdomen/stomach and behind the first layer of skin, from a side (not straight) injection. Meaning you approach the layer of abdominal fat or skin from the side, not from in-front of you.

Consult the Prescribing physician if you are not sure how to take your medication, whether it should be dosed any more frequently, if it should still be taken, if the script is old then it should be queried in many cases before resumption. Especially so if it is a hormonal product or something that is used to treat a chronic condition or acute infection.






In/Tags: dosing terms, list of prescription dose abbreviations, medication dosing schedules, medication dose examples, prescription abbreviate, abbreviations for steroid dosing, terms jargon steroid dosing

Does Masteron Boost Confidence? (Research & Summary for Masteron's Mental Benefits)

This article is simply a Masteron-version of this write-up. Either way, most of the points stand, but there are some things about Masteron that 'stick out' more. First, masteron is an injectable steroid [1], and it has much higher bioavailability than Proviron. Second, Masteron's half-life is way longer, and can be dosed E3D (Every-3-Days) [2]. Third, although there is less actual research for the compound; Drostanolone propionate/enanathate, there's hundreds more anecdotal reports for every 10 that there is for Proviron [3].

Almost every single one of these reports, summaries and logs indicates that Masteron is a hard-hitting, confidence-booster with euphoric or semi-euphoric properties, and I'd have to agree.


Thus, let's not make this article any longer than it has to be.


Does Proviron Boost Confidence? Research & Conclusions Drawn.

One of the many questions I'm asked daily, is ''what is a good substance to boost my confidence'', and what chemicals, if any, increase the 'manly' feeling.
Of course, manly can be seen as subjective, and is also slightly varied based on the area or country's definition of masculinity. 

As a general rule though, DHT-compounds and anything that boosts DHT tends to heighten confidence, at least a little bit. So the answer is actually pretty simple, but the bigger question is, how much of a confidence boost is one looking for and expecting from an exogenous substance.

Proviron, also known as Mesterolone, is a tablet, and has strong benefits against Depression [1] [2] [3], shows remarkable activity in boosting quality of life in those with Aging Male Syndrome (AMS, Andropause, Testosterone decline). This included a boost in confidence and quality of life as shown in the study. Mesterolone also has shown the ability to enhance mood and reduce Anxiety [4] [5], it has been frequently suggested to possess the ability to reverse deficits in brain function caused by androgen deficiency [6] [7] [8]

Lastly, Proviron seems to provide benefits in general nerve function, which may not be easily obtainable with other similar oral compounds, but can be replicated and more with Masteron [9].

So, the answer/s to this question.

  • Yes, Proviron does boost confidence, but not as much as Masteron.
  • Yes, Proviron boosts mood, but again, not as much as Masteron.
  • Yes, Proviron can counter cognitive issues and makes you feel 'on top of the world', when used properly.

So there you have it, the idea of Proviron as a confidence booster is not a new one, but it should be said it is not specifically designed for this purpose, and has never been used clinically specifically for confidence but rather for general Depressive-state, rather, Proviron doesn't rip away your emotions like SSRI's do, however.

Thursday, December 29, 2016

The Obscurity of Mona Lisa

 

  As any art student could agree, there is nothing more irritating than going over the most well known artists through-out history like Pablo Picasso, Vincent van Gogh, Rembrandt, Leonardo Da vinci, you know; seemingly normal, run of the mill artists who we all learned about during our high-school careers. Unless specifically gifted in the arts, hearing these names probably makes you want to fall asleep on the spot unless, of course, there was something more. Something mysterious and seemingly creepy behind the canvas..

  I was never the one for conspiracy theories- actually, I kinda hate them. They're always so far-fetched and thought up by losers who probably never graduated high-school more than we'd like to admit but when you combine something I personally adore with a sense of mystery and conspiracy, I'm all in. As told by my name, my favorite artist is Da vinci and something about him and his work completely intrigues me for whatever reason it may be; more than anything I'm completely mesmerized by the enigma of the ever beautiful Mona Lisa.

  Painted in Florence, starting in 1503 and coming to an end by 1519, the Mona Lisa came to be by the beautiful works of Leonardo Da vinci [1]; lonely and finished in oils, the piece was as incredible then as it is now. Much like anything, there is always aspects of confusion and secrecy in art, but the more or less worlds most famous piece? This creates room for much talk as well as research. So what exactly is the element of uncertainty in Mona? For starters, who exactly is she? There are many stories as to who the woman painted may be; whether a friend, a customer, a model or even no one at all; possibly a self portrait of Leonardo as the opposite gender. It is most widely believed that the woman depicted is Lisa Gherardini, wife of a Florentine cloth merchant, Francesco del Giocondo [2] as the alternative title of the work happens to be La Gioconda, but you and I both know how the Internet and it's users work; we are never settled with facts let alone from hundreds of years ago.

  Upon the many speculations of who Mona Lisa may be, I take the most interest in wondering how many Mona's are there? This is not something you would have learned in grade school, however it is quite riveting to study on how many copies of the world famous painting there actually is.

 

  In the photo shown above, three versions of the Mona Lisa are shown; the first the original 2'6" x 1'9 painting hanging on the wall of the Louvre in Paris, France.

  The second is a first draft of the world famous Mona, scientifically discovered using amazing technologies, underneath the layers of the second draft . These discoveries were made by French scientist, Pascal Cotte, spending over a decade shining strong lights and measuring its reflections (also known as Layer Amplification Method) on the Mona Lisa [3] in order to prove his curiosities of the piece.

  Lastly, shown on the far right is my favorite as it shows chiaroscuro (the contrasting powers of light and dark). This version is not contemplated to be underneath the Mona we all know and love, but perhaps very similar copy, a twin if you will; this version is known as The Isleworth Mona Lisa is thought to be another oil painting done by Leoardo Da vinci, earlier in Lisa Gherardini's life (possibly a decade or so before the most known Mona Lisa was started). Although it is still unknown if The Isleworth Mona Lisa was actually done by Da vinci or not, still remains a mystery, or at least to the general public [4]
 
  So who is she? Who is the Mona Lisa? Could it be Lisa Gherardini, or maybe something not so simple? How many are there? Does the world only know about 3 versions of this ever so beautiful and mysterious painting? These are things, you and I would both love to know and confuses the minds of millions, frustrating scientists, fine/Renaissance art collectors and art students around the world. As well as his paintings, Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci was an odd, quiet and mysterious man; probably why there is so much controversy over his works.

  "A beautiful body perishes, but a work of art dies not." - Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci [5].

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Proviron's Psychoactive Effects (Proviron Effect on Mood/Anxiety) (Does Proviron Improve Depression/Anxiety?)

As stated and explained in an earlier article, many of the studies relating to Proviron (Mesterolone) actually are to do with its benefits in Depressive disorders. Not all of them of course, but, many of them have also outlined Proviron's benefits in Anxiety disorders. In addition to that, Proviron seems to provide cognitive benefit in mental disorders

Proviron lends some benefit in hypoactive sexual states as well, particularly with libido and in some cases, with erectile function, which go hand-in-hand with mood. The idea is that Proviron has the ability to act on both the Brain and reproductive organs to stimulate optimal function and fertility. That means in low doses, it can also incite gonadotropin-activation in some Men, effectively sending the 'signal' to increase sperm production.

Proviron has other benefits as well, it has been studied in the treatment of Depression, Anxiety and worry in those with Cancer [1], HIV/AIDS [2], and in those with ALS [3]

Pharmacology of Anabolic-Androgenic-Steroids, is one of the best books to read on the topic of Proviron and Depression, and also reveals the many many uses of all AAS, not just Proviron.


I recommend reading it for free HERE.
-------------------------------------------------------------
For other Proviron (Mesterolone) Resources go HERE.
-------------------------------------------------------------
To view Mesterolone's Wikigenes entry, Click HERE.
-------------------------------------------------------------


In/Tags: anabolic-steroids and depression, anxiety disorders & proviron, mesterolone for anxiety research, studies of steroids and anxiety, can steroids cure anxiety, steroid cure to anxiety, anabolic androgen steroid for anxiety, best androgen for anxiety, best androgen for depression 2016 2017

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Proviron VS Caber/Bromocriptine/Prami for Libido. (Definitive Answer & Research Included)





One of the many questions I am asked nowadays, and a question well-posed (probably too often) on forums, is if Proviron can match up to the potency, or rather, efficacy, of dopamine agonists in boosting ones libido (sex drive). That's an easy question to answer, as long as you know science. So let's break it down, shall we?

First, Proviron is not and never will be a Prolactin inhibitor [1] [2] [3].
Second, Proviron is not a test-booster, its a DHT-analogue, a DHT-steroid [4] [5].
Third, Proviron improves libido in most men, but particularly, those who already have an androgen deficiency [6] [7], or sub-optimal Testosterone levels [8] [9], and 'enhances' libido in those with high-normal testosterone levels [10] [11].

This means that there's no way in hell, that Proviron can be compared to dopamine agonists in light of its mechanism of action, and its purported dependencies.

Make no mistake though, Proviron is great for libido, its just NOT a dopamine agonist, it doesn't work on the spinal cord and really not with the nervous system. It does act within the Brain, but not as a direct effect on sexual reflexes. Now, Proviron has tremendous benefit in the bodybuilding community, it is without a doubt, one of the most useful compounds out there, but it has to be classified right.

...Otherwise we are putting Eggs in an Apple basket.

  1. If you have a Prolactin issue, you want a dopamine agonist, simple as that.
  2. If you don't have a dopamine issue or Prolactin, you probably don't need a dopamine-agent.
  3. If you abused dopaminergics and dopamine agonists in the past, you probably have a dopamine issue that isn't repairable by an agonist alone.
  4. If you are looking for a libido-enhancement and you have no androgen deficiency, no Prolactin issue, and no other hormonal problems, then Proviron may well be perfect for you.
  5. If you DO have low T levels, you should at least use some Testosterone with it, either something like Aquatest or AndroGel if you want a gel.

So that's that, 'IGHT???

IGHT!!!


Saturday, December 24, 2016

Insights & General Thoughts on The Deadliest Viruses and Bacterial Diseases on Earth

Urban Warfare by Pathogen
Written by : JayZin De'Russo.

In the developed world and the economically depleted world, and cities, there remains a major threat to the well-being of it's inhabitants, and the health of our people. Often overlooked, are the viruses that rodents carry, aka the "Hantaviruses'', that can be toxic to the cardiovascular system, and can, in some cases, be deadly. 

These hantaviruses are spread by rodent feces, including breathing them in, unknowingly consuming them, or by simply having them be exposed near any thin epithelial layer of the body or in contact with a wound.

Cotton Rat's and deer mice as well as ''white-footed-mouse'' are the most likely contributors to infection with a hantavirus. You don't see infections outside of those species except with rice rats occasionally. 


Now of course, rats and mice are not willingly engaged in a ''war'' against humanity, and those rodents largely are unaffected by the virus, so then oddly, it affects some mammals and humans who come into contact with them or their droppings. The title was just a shiny way to enlighten the masses on threats that most of us (probably) overlook.

The disturbing thing about this phenomenon is that continuous interaction with infected rodents can cause more of the disease, that means that the virus, largely increases and can proliferate in the body as more of it is introduced. 

It becomes prudent then, to immediately clean the house or dwelling where these rodents inhabit, and in which humans coincide for the health of the population and any future inhabitants. 

It has been noted that, even healthy individuals can fall ill to the virus, and treatment is not specific, but rather based on supportive measures {See Source Here} and thus, recovery is often a natural process. There does not seem to be specific treatments for hantavirus, but some herbs like Ginseng, Echinachea and Goldenseal may boost the immune system enough to fight it off. 

Regardless, symptoms of hantavirus can begin hours to days after infection, some phases include a hypotensive phase where blood pressure drops and heart rate fastens, followed by diuresis which is progressive loss of water and excess urination. 

All of these symptoms are usually what warrants support therapy and possibly ventilation, oxygenation and hydration via a tube, especially if the hantavirus progresses to Diarrhea and Vomiting (which they often do).

Also, it's important to note that the correct term for the syndrome when symptoms begin is HPS or hantavirus-pulmonary-syndrome.

That is the term most Physician's and Doctor's will recognize and will alarm them to treat you quickly.

Describing the hypotension, vomiting, diarrhea, fast heart rate are the quickest ways to prioritize the discussion. These viruses can often cause medical emergencies, so it is necessary that if you suspect infection by rodent droppings that you get medical help or call 911. This is even more important if you feel dramatically unwell, have just gotten over a cold or flu, or have other health issues including cardiovascular disease.



EBOLA Virus & Marburg Virus : Two Sides of the Same Deadly Coin

Since these ''filoviruses'', which is the correct classification for them, have hit many countries, including West Africa and the USA, there were such immediate precautions and steps taken to identify the source and Quarantine individuals / environments to prevent further spread - due to it's deadly nature. These two viruses are also known as 'hemorrhagic viruses', which means they cause hemorrhage; bleeding, rupture and organ disruption and in some cases organ failure. 

Ebola seems to be treated by supportive measures mainly, but consuming African Bitter Kola Nuts may stop virus replication and consuming several cloves of Garlic may also interfere with the Ebola virus. Olive Leaf Extract as also reported in our How to Counter Ebola Virus article may all be very helpful [1] [2].

As far as an actual cure, there doesn't appear to be one in the traditional sense, but many people do recover from the Ebola virus on their own [3].


RABIES "Virus of Madness & Death"
A Legacy of Utter Destruction

There is no virus like Rabies. Very few live to speak of it (who were/are infected), for very long at least... The Rabies Virus (RV/TRV) is certainly, for almost everyone, a sentence of Death.

It infects the CNS (Central Nervous System) prominently, and causes whole brain Inflammation (encephalitis). It rapidly penetrates the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and causes more or less, 'chaos' amongst brain cells and nerve networks.

It messes with neurotransmitters BAD, and pretty much fucks up everything to do with neurons and nerve communication. Hence why people literally go 'stark raving mad' when they are infected with the virus. That's also why by translation and proper dialogue, it should be named the `Virus of Madness and Death'. 





DENGUE VIRUS : DENGUE FEVER
Deng 'it All.

Even though tropical and subtropical regions are at most risk for this disease, there are still around 20,000 cases in the USA per year. The virus is typically worse than West Nile virus/infection and is a particularly nasty virus in terms of symptom presentation. It also can affect multiple organs, sometimes including the Liver and Kidneys.

Dengue Fever is a horrible ailment for most people, and the young children and Elderly are at particular risk, as with other mosquito-borne illnesses. There are treatments, but even with treatment, there are still fatalities.

This fever is particularly active, and Latin American nations, and often in some areas of the South near the  Mexican border. Bolivia and Spain, and many areas of South East China still remain hit points for Dengue-carrying mosquitoes. Those regions are particularly affected by the disease. 

HIV/AIDS

There are still a lot of questions unanswered about the so-called ''human immunodeficiency virus'', and a lot of shady histories behind the initial 'identification' of the virus, the identifiers behind it (e.g Gallo) and the media circus that presents on both sides of 'scientific opinion'. 

The fact of the matter is, the virus most likely does not actually cause immune deficiency, at least not without several co-factors and a vulnerable genetic background. 

It does indeed cause however, the following initial problems...

  • Mononucleolis-like symptoms in the first few weeks of infection; including swollen lymph nodes, and fatigue, nausea/vomiting and coughing [4] [5].
  • Cause initial cytokine release (like most viruses) which indicates a mild inflammatory response [6] [7] [8].
  • May *possibly* gastrointestinal discomfort [9].
These symptoms however, and the effects in the body are not that different than other viruses like Influenza (the flu), and some herpes-viruses. Even though, structurally, the virus is a whole-different ballgame. 

Some things I disagree with Duesberg and other ''AIDS Denialists'' on is that.
Their statements indicate that it doesn't technically kill cells and that it is a harmless passenger virus, ultimately, I believe though...


Does it cause AIDS? Probably not.

Again, in order for this to actually occur the person would have to be already immuno-suppressed by multiple factors, although, this is more common than you may think. Many people are already immunosuppressed and don't know it.

So in reality, it does make sense that it appeared to 'target' African's, Hispanics and Gays, in the beginning and continuing throughout the years, because a high percentage of these groups live in areas that are effectively 'toxic' environments, I can't the same though for country-living African-American's and Latino's however. 

Homosexuals with drug-abuse tendencies as well as genital abrasions and sores would be at higher risk of multiple STI's and thus frequently would be found with suppressed immune systems.

It really comes down to lifestyle, and how health-conscious the person is.

A few other things I find curious about this phenomenon.

  1. The so-called medical establishment re-classified HIV from ''retrovirus'' to ''lentivirus'' which actually means slow virus (lenti or lente being latin for slow). I find it odd that it and a few other non-human affecting viruses were specifically re-classified into a group which only they share. It seems possible, even probable, that this was a deliberate reclassification to both cover up 'loose ends' in scientific research regarding HIV, but also to accommodate the current exaggerations regarding the viruses activities.
  2. That the virus seems to target a small percentage of people less effectively, and some deemed 'elite suppressors' are more or less immune to the virus. {See Here}
  3. The fact that individuals infected with the virus form several groups of people, and the fact that new terms have come out of the woodwork to accommodate the definition of which could otherwise simply be described as 'a person with a strong Immune system', seems to be a phenomena more suited to marketing/advertising than to explaining medically relevant information.
Whereas the existence of Cancer, Rabies, Lupus and other serious diseases are well-defined (and not really debated), HIV/AIDS remains the only disease where specific 'dissident' groups and a long-history of political and corporate conflicts have formed a two-sided battlefield; the mainstream medical and media establishment and then the 'rethinking AIDS' groups whom cater more to scientists like Peter Duesberg and Dr. Robert Wilner. 

What's fascinating is that you have nearly equal momentum on both sides, and that each side is receiving perhaps, a difference in overall funding, but no depletion of characters, lawyers and certainty in opinion to actually change the course in one favor. 

Now, on the other hand you still have beliefs like "HIV doesn't exist'' and AIDS is a made-up disease, which are complete bullshit statements if taken for face value, however, remember that every chemical, pathogen and disease is named based on its respective classification, and names have to come from somewhere (or someone). So, HIV does indeed exist, but just because the virus exists, doesn't mean the name suits it, especially since it took on two other names before it became HIV.

So, what's the mainstream medical establishment been doing all this time to find a cure for an elaborate 'forged' disease?

Have they made progress?

Well of course they have, instead of drugs like AZT they have newer medications called 'anti-retrovirals' which are supposed to suppress the virus but not the body's own immune system. Am I buying that? No, not until I see sufficient evidence that these drugs are safe. I maintain my stance that in any case, every single virus and bacterial agent can be defeated by the body's own immune system. 

With exception ONLY of viruses like Rabies; which have no cure, herbal or otherwise.

Then of course, if you really wanna go far, you will find that agents that specifically attack the respiratory system, of which are largely bacterial in nature, like Anthrax and Botulinum toxin, these are either extremely difficult to antidote, or very difficult to treat in general. Especially anthrax, both are equally deadly, though.

These bacterial agents are purified and pharmaceutically enhanced though, in order to be considered 'bioweapons' so they shouldn't really be considered as naturally occurring to the living world.

Because the context in which they are placed is usually where these redesigned, or amplified versions of these substances are 'released' onto a population or used in a detonation or dispersal device. Therefore, even though technically there is no cure, for them, they aren't diseases in the traditional sense. 

Botulinum toxin and Anthrax thus should actually be considered 'chemically-induced disease' or pharmaceutical agents that cause disease and death.

In which case, considering them part of the bacterial world is a mistake.

With HIV/AIDS you have a different story, and a 'first' for every health phenomena imaginable, a paradigm never before seen in the medical industry, so much so, that up until this day, and still moving forward, there is a massive amount of debate, skepticism, and worry regarding the 'true' nature of HIV.

Main ''Official'' Source for HIV/AIDS Information : 








IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN

***OTHER INTERESTING NOTES***
Corticosteroid Induced, HHV-8 Positive Kaposi’s Sarcoma in a Non-HIV Elderly Patient

Kaposi sarcoma and quinine: A potentially overlooked triggering factor in millions of Africans

Kaposi's sarcoma induced by quinapril.


These sources/citations above are fascinating in that, it shows that there multiple causes of Kaposi's sarcoma, including a few ACE inhibitor drugs, some preservatives, the chemicals used to ''cut'' heroin, like Quinine. All on their own without any virus besides the Herpes-virus 8 present within the body, can cause Kaposi's sarcoma. Which means that this normally "AIDS-specific" disease can actually be caused by other factors. Completely proven.

Then...

The biggest ditch in HIV/AIDS research is the FACT that almost every single drug used to treat HIV/AIDS causes the VERY symptoms associated with the disease. Which means, nausea, vomiting, tremor, headache, dizziness, psychosomatic reactions, allergic reactions, neurological phenomena; Peripheral neuropathy and neurocognitive dysfunction, every single one of these 'symptoms' has been PROVEN to be a side-effect of these HIV drugs.

Every single one of them has bizarre and strange side-effects, (not that all medicines don't), but isn't it so strange that they haven't found really ONE absolutely unique symptom to the so-called AIDS-epidemic that can actually be provably and uniquely linked to the virus? Something that IS NOT associated with the medicines.

GTFOH.

Seriously, this is what fascinates me, and makes me wonder how much of this phenomenon is complete bullshit. Put that in addition to the fact that its the only so-called 'virus' that behaves in the way that they say it does. Means that either.

A: HIV is named that just to ''sell'' the unique phenomenon and as an intentional means of murdering people by the aftermath.
B: The Virus is bioengineered/genetically engineered and was implanted in to the chimpanzees in order to have it later ''found'' by scientists.
C: The truth is its an exotic incurable disease.

All are possible I suppose, but being that there are more cracks in the foundation of the science behind HIV/AIDS I strongly believe that A is the proper option.

Another valid comment below, another way to look at it.


Duesberg is Right, remember his later videos and works is that "HIV must require Co-factors in order to cause Disease". Here's whats going on : HIV in itself may suppress the immune system, or at the very least cause cytokine release and inflammation {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7927984}. However, in itself is NOT *sufficient* to cause AIDS, at least not in Healthy people. Certain genetic backgrounds are, or seem to be, more affected by the Virus (including some descendents of Africa, some hispanic groups, and perhaps some other mixed groups). However, I think this is mostly due to close/near ancestors living in unfavourable environments, in other words, city areas or economically depleted areas where little nutrition plays a large role in developing a weaker gene response in Immune System. So, in these people who grow up in environments, with brothers or sisters that use drugs, then other perhaps, unfavorable genes are passed down, leading to the mentioned susceptibility to immune suppression {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12464348}.
Also, its highly probable that HIV depends on other common factors such as Cadmium & Copper toxicity (think the "Two C's"), and these two metals present with yeast infections as a 'side-effect'. Therefore, heavy metal toxicity plays a role in both yeast infections and candida overgrowth BOTH in HIV-infected individuals and in those without the virus {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144270/}. It seems likely that we simply have a general state of immune suppression so any further infection becomes a real problem for most individuals living in the areas infected.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTxvmKHYajQ
Lastly, the virus known as "HIV" even though was reclassified as a 'lentivirus', is still ultimately a retrovirus, of sorts, but, it seems to behave differently than most retroviruses, therefore, Duesberg's hypothesis has a lot of merit.  The problem is, however, that there are hundreds of articles that are contrary to his original idea (later revised) of the virus not killing cells, the National Institute of Health, contains most of this information. I do believe though, that many healthy people who have the virus will never develop AIDS, because they are healthy, but in many cases, they will probably need extra supplemental selenium. Anyone who has the virus needs extra antioxidants. Those are biologically immune to the virus are termed 'Elite Suppressors'. If we were to ignore all of these notes, and research, then we would have to assume that thousands of articles are FORGED and studies are fabricated, this is possible, but unlikely. We'd also have to assume all or most of the HIV/AIDS denialists that have died were murdered, or some weird fate has hit them by strange coincidence, also possible, but unlikely. Then again, the fact that a bunch of HIV-researchers were killed on a plane crash {http://www.businessinsider.com/hiv-researchers-killed-on-malaysia-mh-17-2014-7} could be a Godly sign, that it is still a Deception, and perhaps the virus doesn't cause anything at all. I dunno, it's tough to say, both are possibilities, just gotta use yer' head!!!






Wednesday, 09 April 2014
Anti-immigration Internet Commenters Tracked Down, Persecuted






Ebola and Rabies are two of the nastiest viruses on the planet, next after that you have Hantaviruses (from rodent feces and urine etc). All three of those can be deadly. Rabies most of all because it infects the brain/CNS. Making it one of the only diseases on the earth where humanity hasn't come up with a adequate solution. Cancer is a byproduct of toxic environments, heavy metal contamination, poor immune systems, and negative adaptations to our bodies over years. Most commonly though, Cancer is related to exposure to specific chemicals like Arsenic, Benzene, toxic food dyes, and inhalation of fumes from polluted cities. Anything that makes cells unstable, and lead to oxidative stress can create a biological environment where these diseases can wreak havoc.

Of course, any disease that affects the nervous system will be always be the most deadly as are anything that causes the liver and / or kidneys to fail.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21618891 I'm not sure about this whole solution that NK proposes, haven't bothered to read it yet, but some of these articles are not that impressive. Still, all of these things can be cured it's just not public information.

Organic Kratom #1 Shop!